The Importance of Accurate Registration Statements in Direct Listings: A Case Study of Slack Technologies Inc.

Slack Technologies Inc., a leading communication platform provider, has been at the center of several high-profile lawsuits in recent years. In one such case, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Slack and its controlling persons under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, alleging that the company's registration statement was inaccurate and misleading.

The panel explained that since standing existed for the plaintiff's Section 11 claim against Slack, it also existed for a dependent Section 15 claim against controlling persons. The panel concluded that the plaintiff had standing to bring a claim under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) because his shares could not be purchased without the issuance of Slack's registration statement, thereby marking these shares as 'such security' under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act.

The plaintiff alleged that Slack's registration statement was inaccurate and misleading because it did not alert prospective shareholders to the generous terms of Slack's service agreements. These agreements obligated Slack to pay for service disruptions, which were frequent due to the company's guarantee of 99.99% uptime. Additionally, the statement downplayed the competition Slack faced from Microsoft Teams at the time of its direct listing.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying in part a motion to dismiss and ruling that the plaintiff had standing to sue Slack and individual defendants under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 based on shares issued under a new rule from the New York Stock Exchange allowing companies to make shares available to the public through a direct listing.

This case highlights the importance of accurate registration statements in direct listings, particularly when companies are making their shares available to the public for the first time. As seen in this case, inaccurate and misleading information can lead to serious consequences for both the company and its stakeholders. Therefore, it is crucial that companies take the necessary steps to ensure that their registration statements are accurate and transparent.

Moreover, this case underscores the need for regulatory bodies to closely monitor direct listings and ensure that companies are complying with all relevant regulations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should pay particular attention to the accuracy and transparency of registration statements in direct listings, as seen in this case where the plaintiff alleged that Slack's statement was inaccurate and misleading.

In conclusion, the case of Slack Technologies Inc. serves as a reminder of the importance of accurate registration statements in direct listings. Companies must take the necessary steps to ensure that their registration statements are accurate and transparent, while regulatory bodies should closely monitor direct listings to prevent similar cases from arising in the future.

Slack technologies inc